frontier-banner
前沿速递
首页>前沿速递>

Nature Medicine | Phase 1 Study of the FcRH5×CD3 Bispecific Antibody Cevostamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Nature Medicine | Phase 1 Study of the FcRH5×CD3 Bispecific Antibody Cevostamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
--

This study provides a novel non-BCMA-targeted strategy for advanced treatment of multiple myeloma, particularly beneficial for patients progressing after BCMA-directed therapies, suggesting that rational sequential application of T-cell redirecting therapies may improve clinical outcomes.

 

Literature Overview

This article, 'FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 trial,' published in Nature Medicine, systematically investigates the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of cevostamab, a bispecific antibody targeting FcRH5, in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. The study employs a dose-escalation and expansion design to evaluate the efficacy of fixed-duration treatment, with particular attention to management strategies for cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This research fills a critical clinical gap in the absence of effective interventions following failure of BCMA-targeted therapies.

Background Knowledge

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, and nearly all patients eventually develop triple-class resistance (to anti-CD38, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs), termed triple-refractory multiple myeloma. Although BCMA-targeted CAR-T and bispecific antibodies have significantly improved outcomes, most patients still relapse, and some experience antigen escape or T-cell exhaustion. Moreover, while GPRC5D-targeted therapies are effective, they are associated with on-target, off-tumor toxicities such as skin and nail disorders. Therefore, developing T-cell redirecting therapies targeting non-BCMA antigens is an urgent unmet need.

FcRH5 (Fc receptor homolog protein 5) is a B-cell lineage-specific membrane protein widely expressed on nearly all multiple myeloma cells, with no significant correlation to BCMA expression, making it an ideal alternative target. However, the endogenous function of FcRH5 is not fully understood, and its expression on normal B cells may pose potential toxicity risks. This study, driven by this unmet clinical need and target potential, developed cevostamab, the first-generation humanized IgG1 FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody, designed to eliminate myeloma cells via T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

 

 

Research Methods and Experiments

The study adopted an open-label, multicenter phase 1 design (GO39775, NCT03275103), enrolling 324 patients with advanced multiple myeloma, who had received a median of six prior lines of therapy, with 89.5% being triple-refractory and 47.5% having previously received BCMA-targeted therapy. Patients received step-up dosing to reduce CRS risk, followed by intravenous infusions every three weeks at the target dose (TD) for up to 17 cycles (approximately 12 months). Primary endpoints were safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key design elements included various step-up regimens (single/double/triple step) and TD ranges (0.15–252 mg), with optimal dose combinations determined through exposure-response analysis.

For mechanistic validation, the study confirmed widespread FcRH5 expression in tumor samples via flow cytometry and assessed the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and neutralizing antibodies. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed dose-proportional systemic exposure with a half-life of approximately 13 days. Additionally, the study evaluated minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates and explored the relationship between FcRH5 expression levels and efficacy in biomarker-evaluable patients.

Key Conclusions and Perspectives

  • In all patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 42.1%, with 25.1% achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and a median duration of response (DOR) of 11.2 months, demonstrating significant antitumor activity of the FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody. These data support FcRH5 as a valid therapeutic target in multiple myeloma and provide a clear efficacy signal for subsequent phase 2 studies.
  • In the RP2D cohort (160 mg with three-step escalation), the CRS incidence was 74.3%, but the vast majority were grade 1–2, with no grade 4 events, and CRS was effectively managed with tocilizumab. This indicates that CRS is a manageable toxicity, underscoring the critical role of step-up dosing in mitigating cytokine storm risk and providing guidance for clinical management of future T-cell redirecting therapies.
  • In patients who had not previously received BCMA-targeted therapy, the ORR reached 60.6%, with a DOR of 19.7 months—significantly higher than in those with prior BCMA exposure. This suggests that prior BCMA therapy may impair T-cell function or promote antigen escape, highlighting the therapeutic value of non-BCMA targets after failure of first-line T-cell therapies and supporting prioritization of exploration in BCMA-naïve patients.
  • The median progression-free survival (PFS) was only 2.8 months, yet some patients (especially those achieving VGPR) experienced long-term responses, indicating substantial response heterogeneity. This emphasizes the need for future studies to incorporate MRD monitoring and T-cell functional analyses to identify durable responders and optimize drug development strategies.
  • Patients with 1q21 amplification maintained a high response rate (46.5%), suggesting that 1q21 amplification may not confer resistance. This finding challenges the traditional view of 1q21 amplification as a poor prognostic factor and implies that targeted therapy may overcome adverse effects associated with high-risk cytogenetics, warranting further validation.

Research Significance and Prospects

This study establishes FcRH5 as a viable target in multiple myeloma therapy, advancing the clinical development of non-BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies. Its fixed-duration treatment design may reduce long-term T-cell exhaustion and infection risk, complementing continuous treatment strategies. Future studies should explore the use of cevostamab in earlier lines of therapy and its potential combinations with standard regimens (e.g., pomalidomide).

From a clinical monitoring perspective, standardized assessment protocols for CRS and neurotoxicity are needed, along with exploration of predictive biomarkers such as T-cell phenotypes and cytokine profiles to optimize patient management. Additionally, long-term follow-up data will reveal the durability of responses and potential late-onset toxicities.

 

 

Conclusion

This study marks a significant step toward the era of non-BCMA-targeted therapy in multiple myeloma. Cevostamab demonstrates manageable safety and notable antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients, with particularly strong efficacy in BCMA-naïve individuals. Its fixed-duration treatment design may reduce infection burden associated with prolonged immunosuppression, improving quality of life. From bench to bedside, this study not only validates the therapeutic potential of FcRH5 but also provides evidence supporting the rational sequential use of T-cell redirecting therapies. In the future, integrating MRD-guided personalized treatment strategies may further extend response durations and advance the management of multiple myeloma toward a chronic disease model. Furthermore, the success of FcRH5-targeted therapy will inspire exploration of additional alternative targets, enriching the arsenal of T-cell immunotherapies and ultimately improving patient survival and quality of life.

 

Reference:
Adam D Cohen, Joshua Richter, Suzanne Trudel, James Cooper, and Amrita Krishnan. FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 trial. Nature Medicine.
ImmuneBuilder(AntiBody)
ImmuneBuilder, including ABodyBuilder2, NanoBodyBuilder2, and TCRBuilder2, is specifically designed for predicting the structure of immunoproteins (e.g., antibodies, nanobodies, and T-cell receptors), and employs AlphaFold-Multimer's structural modules with modifications specific to the immunoproteins to improve prediction accuracy.ImmuneBuilder is able to quickly generate immunoprotein structures that resemble experimental data much faster than AlphaFold2 and without the need for large sequence databases or multiple sequence comparisons. The tool's features include high accuracy, fast prediction, and open-source accessibility for structural analysis of large-scale sequence datasets, especially in the study of immunoprotein structures from next-generation sequencing data. immuneBuilder also provides error estimation to help filter out erroneous models, enhancing its value for applications in biotherapeutics and immunology research. Figure 1 shows the architecture of AbBuilder2, and the same architecture is used for NanoBodyBuilder2 and TCRBuilder2.